42 SOLID interview questions to ask your candidates

For interviewers looking to assess candidates’ understanding of the SOLID principles, having a comprehensive list of questions is invaluable. These principles form the backbone of robust software design, making it crucial to vet candidates on their knowledge in this area effectively.

This blog post will provide a curated list of SOLID interview questions categorized for basic, junior developer, and principle-specific assessments. These questions are designed to help you evaluate both theoretical understanding and practical application of SOLID principles.

Using these questions, you can more effectively identify candidates who possess strong foundational knowledge in software design. For a more thorough evaluation, consider our SOLID Principles Test prior to conducting interviews.

Table of contents

15 basic SOLID interview questions and answers to assess candidates

To assess candidates' understanding of SOLID principles and their ability to apply them in software development, use these 15 basic SOLID interview questions. These questions will help you evaluate a candidate's grasp of essential object-oriented design concepts and their potential to write clean, maintainable code.

1. Can you explain what SOLID stands for and give a brief overview of each principle?
2. How does the Single Responsibility Principle improve code maintainability?
3. Provide an example of how you've applied the Open-Closed Principle in a recent project.
4. What's the main difference between the Liskov Substitution Principle and the Interface Segregation Principle?
5. How does the Dependency Inversion Principle relate to dependency injection?
6. Can you describe a situation where violating the Single Responsibility Principle led to issues in a project?
7. How would you refactor a large class to better adhere to the Single Responsibility Principle?
8. Explain how the Open-Closed Principle can help in reducing the risk of bugs when adding new features.
9. What are some common pitfalls when trying to implement the Liskov Substitution Principle?
10. How does the Interface Segregation Principle help in creating more flexible and maintainable systems?
11. Can you give an example of how you've used the Dependency Inversion Principle to improve testability?
12. How do SOLID principles contribute to creating more scalable software architectures?
13. What challenges have you faced when trying to apply SOLID principles in a legacy codebase?
14. How do you balance applying SOLID principles with meeting project deadlines?
15. Can you describe how SOLID principles relate to other design patterns or architectural concepts you've used?

8 SOLID interview questions and answers to evaluate junior developers

Ready to put your junior developers' SOLID understanding to the test? These 8 interview questions will help you gauge their grasp of these crucial principles. Use them to spark discussions, assess problem-solving skills, and uncover how well candidates can apply SOLID concepts in real-world scenarios. Remember, the goal isn't just to hear textbook answers, but to see how they think on their feet!

1. Can you explain a real-world scenario where applying the Single Responsibility Principle improved a system's design?

A strong answer might describe a scenario like refactoring a monolithic class that handled user authentication, profile management, and notification sending into separate classes. For example:

• The original UserManager class was split into AuthenticationService, ProfileManager, and NotificationService.

• This separation made each class more focused, easier to test, and simpler to maintain.

• It also allowed for easier scaling and updating of individual components without affecting others.

Look for candidates who can articulate the benefits of this separation, such as improved code maintainability, easier debugging, and the ability to modify one aspect of the system without impacting others. Follow up by asking how this change affected the overall system architecture or team workflow.

2. How would you explain the Open-Closed Principle to a junior developer who's never heard of SOLID?

A good response should break down the principle into simple terms, perhaps using an analogy. For instance:

"Imagine you're building with LEGO. The Open-Closed Principle is like being able to add new LEGO pieces to your creation without having to break apart what you've already built. In coding, it means designing your software so that you can add new features without changing existing code."

Look for candidates who can provide a clear, relatable explanation. They might also mention practical examples, such as using interfaces or abstract classes to allow for easy extension. Assess their ability to communicate complex concepts in an understandable way, which is crucial for mentoring junior team members.

3. Can you describe a situation where strictly adhering to the Liskov Substitution Principle might be challenging?

A thoughtful answer might discuss scenarios like:

• Inheriting from legacy code that wasn't designed with LSP in mind

• Working with third-party libraries or APIs that don't follow LSP

• Dealing with domain-specific cases where subclasses might need to restrict behavior of the base class

For example, a candidate might mention a Square class inheriting from a Rectangle class, where changing the width of a Square should also change its height to maintain its square nature, violating the expectation set by the Rectangle base class.

Look for candidates who can not only identify challenging scenarios but also propose potential solutions or workarounds. This demonstrates their ability to think critically about design principles and adapt them to real-world constraints.

4. How would you refactor a 'God Object' to better adhere to SOLID principles?

A comprehensive answer should outline a step-by-step approach:

1. Identify distinct responsibilities within the God Object

2. Create new classes for each responsibility

3. Move relevant methods and properties to these new classes

4. Establish relationships between these classes (composition over inheritance)

5. Update the original class to use these new classes

6. Refactor client code to interact with the new structure

Candidates should emphasize the importance of maintaining functionality throughout the refactoring process and potentially mention the use of design patterns like Factory or Strategy to manage the newly created objects. Look for awareness of potential challenges, such as maintaining backwards compatibility or dealing with tight coupling in the original design.

5. How does the Interface Segregation Principle relate to microservices architecture?

A strong answer would draw parallels between ISP and microservices design philosophy:

• Both emphasize creating small, focused units (interfaces/services) that serve a single purpose

• They promote modularity and loose coupling between components

• Both make it easier to develop, test, and deploy individual parts of a system independently

• ISP in microservices can be seen in the design of API contracts between services

Look for candidates who can explain how applying ISP can lead to more maintainable and scalable microservices. They might discuss how it helps prevent unnecessary dependencies between services and allows for easier evolution of the system over time. Consider asking for specific examples of how they've applied this principle in a microservices context.

6. Can you give an example of how violating the Dependency Inversion Principle could lead to problems in a large-scale application?

A good response might describe a scenario like this:

"Imagine a large e-commerce application where the OrderProcessing module directly depends on a specific PaymentGateway class. If we need to switch to a different payment provider or add support for multiple providers, we'd have to modify the OrderProcessing code. This violates DIP and could lead to:

• Increased risk of introducing bugs in critical order processing logic

• Difficulty in adding or switching payment providers

• Challenges in unit testing OrderProcessing in isolation

• Reduced flexibility and increased coupling in the system"

Look for candidates who can articulate the long-term implications of such violations, such as decreased maintainability and scalability. They should also be able to suggest how to refactor the code to adhere to DIP, perhaps by introducing an abstract PaymentProvider interface.

7. How would you balance applying SOLID principles with the need for rapid development in a startup environment?

A nuanced answer should acknowledge the trade-offs involved:

• Recognize that perfect adherence to SOLID principles isn't always practical in a fast-paced environment

• Suggest prioritizing principles that offer the most immediate benefit (e.g., SRP for maintainability)

• Propose incremental application of SOLID principles as the codebase grows

• Emphasize the importance of code reviews and refactoring sessions to gradually improve design

Look for candidates who demonstrate pragmatism and the ability to make informed decisions. They should be able to explain how they would communicate the long-term benefits of SOLID principles to stakeholders while still meeting short-term business needs. Consider asking for specific examples from their past experience in balancing these concerns.

8. How do SOLID principles contribute to creating more testable code?

A comprehensive answer should touch on how each principle enhances testability:

• Single Responsibility: Smaller, focused units are easier to test in isolation

• Open-Closed: New functionality can be added through extension, reducing the need to modify (and re-test) existing code

• Liskov Substitution: Ensures that objects can be replaced with subtypes without affecting correctness, simplifying test scenarios

• Interface Segregation: Smaller interfaces lead to more focused mock objects and test doubles

• Dependency Inversion: Allows for easy substitution of dependencies with mocks or stubs in unit tests

Look for candidates who can provide specific examples of how these principles have improved testability in their past projects. They might mention concepts like dependency injection, mock objects, or test-driven development. Assess their understanding of how good design principles and testability are interconnected in creating robust software systems.

12 SOLID questions related to principles and applications

To assess whether candidates have a solid grasp of software design principles, use this list of targeted SOLID interview questions. These questions will help you evaluate their understanding and practical application of these concepts, ensuring you find the right fit for your software developer job description.

1. Can you describe a scenario where applying the Open-Closed Principle resulted in improved code quality?
2. What strategies do you use to ensure compliance with the Liskov Substitution Principle in your code?
3. How do you approach testing when implementing the Dependency Inversion Principle?
4. Can you share an experience where following the Interface Segregation Principle enhanced team collaboration?
5. What is the significance of the Dependency Inversion Principle in microservices architecture?
6. How would you explain the importance of SOLID principles to a non-technical stakeholder?
7. In your opinion, how do SOLID principles influence code readability and team productivity?
8. Can you give an example of how you've adapted SOLID principles in a rapidly changing project environment?
9. How do you determine which SOLID principle to prioritize when facing design challenges?
10. What tools or practices do you find helpful for enforcing SOLID principles in your codebase?
11. Can you discuss a time when applying the Single Responsibility Principle led to a more efficient design?
12. How do you ensure that your code remains flexible yet adheres to the Open-Closed Principle?

7 SOLID interview questions and answers related to principles

To determine if your candidates have a solid grasp of the SOLID principles, use these interview questions. They will help you assess your candidates' understanding and practical application of these core software design principles, ensuring you hire the right talent for your development team.

1. How does adhering to the SOLID principles benefit software development projects?

Adhering to SOLID principles helps in creating software that is easier to manage, extend, and refactor. These principles encourage a modular approach, reducing dependencies and making the codebase more flexible.

Candidates should mention that this leads to improved code quality, easier maintenance, and the ability to adapt to changes without significant rework. It also promotes better team collaboration and enhances the scalability of the software.

Look for answers that emphasize practical benefits and real-world applications. Ideal candidates will provide examples from past experiences where applying SOLID principles has led to positive outcomes.

2. Can you explain a scenario where the Interface Segregation Principle was particularly useful?

The Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) states that no client should be forced to depend on methods it does not use. A useful scenario could be designing a payment processing system where different payment methods (credit card, PayPal, etc.) require different interfaces.

By implementing ISP, each payment method would have its own interface, ensuring that clients using specific payment methods are not burdened with unnecessary methods from other payment interfaces.

Ideal candidates should illustrate how ISP helped in creating more focused and manageable interfaces. Look for specific examples and how it simplified code maintenance and reduced the risk of errors.

3. What are the challenges you might face when applying the Open-Closed Principle in an existing codebase?

Applying the Open-Closed Principle (OCP) in an existing codebase can be challenging because it often requires significant refactoring. Existing classes need to be extended rather than modified, which might not be straightforward if the code was not designed with OCP in mind.

Legacy code may have tight coupling and lack clear abstractions, making it difficult to implement OCP without disrupting existing functionality. The process can be time-consuming and requires a deep understanding of the system.

Look for candidates who acknowledge these challenges and can propose strategies to overcome them, such as incremental refactoring, creating new abstractions, and using design patterns to facilitate adherence to OCP.

4. How can the Dependency Inversion Principle improve software testability?

The Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP) states that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules but both should depend on abstractions. This principle improves testability by allowing dependencies to be easily mocked or stubbed during testing.

By depending on abstractions, you can isolate the unit under test and replace real dependencies with mock objects, making unit tests more straightforward and reliable.

An ideal candidate should provide examples of how implementing DIP has led to easier and more effective testing. Look for discussions on how dependency injection frameworks can assist in adhering to DIP and improving overall test coverage.

5. Can you discuss how applying the Single Responsibility Principle can affect team collaboration?

The Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) states that a class should have only one reason to change, meaning it should have only one job or responsibility. Applying SRP can positively affect team collaboration by creating clear boundaries of responsibility within the codebase.

When each class has a single responsibility, it becomes easier for team members to understand, modify, and extend the code without stepping on each other's toes. This clarity reduces conflicts and improves code ownership.

Ideal candidates should highlight how SRP has led to better communication and coordination within their teams. Look for examples where SRP enabled parallel development and reduced the likelihood of merge conflicts.

6. What strategies would you use to ensure compliance with the Liskov Substitution Principle in your code?

The Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) states that objects of a superclass should be replaceable with objects of a subclass without affecting the correctness of the program. To ensure compliance with LSP, one strategy is to design subclasses that only extend the behavior of the superclass without altering its fundamental behavior.

Another strategy is to use rigorous unit testing to ensure that subclasses can be used interchangeably with their superclass without causing issues. This involves testing all methods inherited from the superclass in the context of the subclass.

Strong candidates will provide examples of how they've used these strategies in past projects. Look for detailed explanations on preventing violations of LSP and maintaining robust and interchangeable class hierarchies.

7. How do you balance the need for rapid development with the application of SOLID principles in a fast-paced environment?

Balancing rapid development with the application of SOLID principles can be challenging. One approach is to prioritize the most critical SOLID principles for the project's success and incrementally apply others as the project evolves.

Using agile methodologies, developers can iteratively improve the codebase, applying SOLID principles during refactoring phases. This allows for maintaining code quality while meeting tight deadlines.

Candidates should explain their strategies for iterative improvement and prioritization. Look for responses that show a pragmatic approach to applying SOLID principles without compromising the project's delivery schedule.

Which SOLID skills should you evaluate during the interview phase?

While it's impossible to fully gauge a candidate's capabilities through a single interview, focusing on key SOLID skills can provide crucial insights into their potential. By honing in on these select areas, interviewers can make more informed decisions about candidates' technical proficiency and their ability to adhere to sound design principles.

Understanding of Single Responsibility Principle

The Single Responsibility Principle is fundamental to maintaining clean and manageable code. It ensures that a class or module has one reason to change, simplifying debugging and enhancing code quality.

To effectively evaluate candidates' grasp of this principle, consider using a tailored assessment that challenges their understanding through relevant scenarios. The SOLID principles test at Adaface could be a great starting point.

During the interview, ask specific questions that reveal how deeply the candidate understands and applies the Single Responsibility Principle.

Can you describe a situation where applying the Single Responsibility Principle significantly improved a project you worked on?

Look for answers that demonstrate clear understanding and practical application. The candidate should be able to identify problems in code that violates this principle and articulate how they refactored it.

Application of Open/Closed Principle

The Open/Closed Principle is key to developing software that is easy to extend without modification. It encourages robust design that minimizes the risk of bugs when new functionalities are added.

To assess understanding of the Open/Closed Principle, frame questions that test the candidate's ability to extend software functionalities without altering existing code.

How would you modify an existing system to add new features while adhering to the Open/Closed Principle?

Effective responses should include strategies for using abstractions and patterns like Strategy or Decorator to extend behavior. The candidate should display a methodical approach to maintenance and scalability.

Mastery of Interface Segregation and Dependency Inversion Principles

These principles are critical for creating flexible, loosely coupled systems. Interface Segregation fosters clearer, more concise interfaces, while Dependency Inversion decouples high-level modules from low-level ones.

While these are more advanced concepts, using a structured assessment test could help in evaluating these skills efficiently.

Ask questions that probe the candidate’s ability to design robust systems using these principles.

Explain how you have implemented Dependency Inversion and Interface Segregation in a past project.

Candidates should discuss specific design patterns and scenarios where they applied these principles, demonstrating a clear understanding and practical application.

Hire top talent with SOLID skills tests and the right interview questions

If you are looking to hire someone with SOLID skills, it is important to ensure candidates accurately possess those skills. A thorough assessment will help you identify the right talent for your team.

One of the best ways to evaluate these skills is by utilizing skill tests. Consider using the SOLID Principles Test to gauge candidates' understanding and application of these principles.

After administering the test, you can effectively shortlist the best applicants for interviews. This process streamlines your hiring efforts by ensuring that only qualified candidates proceed to the next stage.

To get started, visit our assessment test library to explore the various options available. Sign up today to enhance your hiring strategy and find the right SOLID experts for your team.

Download SOLID interview questions template in multiple formats

Download image Download PDF

Download TXT

SOLID Interview Questions FAQs