55 Situational Judgement interview questions to assess candidates at all levels

When it comes to hiring, asking the right situational judgement interview questions can help you identify the most capable candidates. Understanding how applicants would react in real-world scenarios is crucial to making an informed hiring decision.

In this blog post, we will provide you with a comprehensive list of situational judgement interview questions tailored for different levels of employees. Whether you are interviewing junior employees or top-tier professionals, these questions will help you assess their decision-making and problem-solving skills.

Using these questions will enhance your hiring process by ensuring you select candidates who can handle the challenges they may face in their roles. For a more thorough evaluation, consider complementing your interviews with our Situational Judgement Test.

Table of contents

6 general Situational Judgement interview questions and answers to assess candidates

Ready to put your candidates through their paces? These situational judgment questions will help you assess how well applicants can handle real-world scenarios. Use them to gauge problem-solving skills, decision-making abilities, and cultural fit. Remember, the best predictor of future performance is often past behavior in similar situations.

1. How would you handle a situation where a colleague takes credit for your work during a team meeting?

A strong candidate response should demonstrate professionalism, assertiveness, and problem-solving skills. They might suggest:

• Remaining calm and composed during the meeting
• Speaking with the colleague privately afterwards to understand their perspective
• Diplomatically correcting the misconception in future meetings or communications
• Ensuring proper documentation of their contributions going forward

Look for answers that show the candidate can handle conflict constructively without damaging team relationships. Follow up by asking how they've dealt with similar situations in the past.

2. Imagine you're leading a project that's falling behind schedule. How would you get it back on track?

An ideal response should showcase the candidate's project management and leadership skills. They might propose:

• Conducting a thorough assessment of the project status and identifying bottlenecks
• Prioritizing tasks and potentially adjusting the scope if necessary
• Communicating transparently with stakeholders about the delays and proposed solutions
• Motivating the team and possibly allocating additional resources

Look for candidates who demonstrate a structured approach to problem-solving and the ability to make tough decisions under pressure. Ask about specific examples from their past experiences to gauge their real-world capabilities.

3. You notice a coworker consistently coming in late and leaving early, affecting team productivity. How do you address this?

A thoughtful answer should balance professionalism with empathy. A strong candidate might suggest:

• Observing the pattern to ensure it's a consistent issue
• Approaching the coworker privately to express concern and understand if there are underlying issues
• If the behavior continues, discussing the impact on the team with the coworker
• Involving a supervisor or HR if the situation doesn't improve after direct communication

Pay attention to responses that show the candidate can handle sensitive interpersonal issues diplomatically. Look for a willingness to address problems directly while also showing consideration for potential personal circumstances.

4. A client is unhappy with a product you've delivered and is threatening to terminate the contract. How do you salvage the situation?

An effective response should demonstrate customer service skills, problem-solving abilities, and a focus on relationship management. A good candidate might propose:

• Listening actively to the client's concerns without becoming defensive
• Apologizing sincerely for the dissatisfaction and taking ownership of the issue
• Proposing concrete solutions or improvements to address the client's specific concerns
• Offering additional value or concessions to rebuild trust and goodwill

Look for candidates who prioritize customer satisfaction and can think creatively to find win-win solutions. Ask about past experiences where they've turned around a difficult client situation.

5. You've been asked to implement a new company policy that you disagree with. How do you handle this situation?

A mature response should show the candidate can balance personal opinions with professional responsibilities. They might suggest:

• Seeking to understand the reasoning behind the policy
• Respectfully voicing concerns to management, backed by data or examples if possible
• If the policy stands, implementing it professionally despite personal reservations
• Finding ways to make the policy work as effectively as possible within the given constraints

Look for answers that demonstrate the ability to adapt to organizational changes, respect for authority, and a constructive approach to disagreements. Follow up by asking about times they've had to implement decisions they initially disagreed with.

6. How would you handle a situation where you made a mistake that could potentially cost the company a significant amount of money?

A responsible answer should show accountability, problem-solving skills, and integrity. A strong candidate might propose:

• Immediately informing their supervisor about the mistake
• Taking swift action to mitigate any potential damage
• Conducting a thorough analysis to understand how the mistake occurred
• Developing and presenting a plan to prevent similar errors in the future

Look for candidates who demonstrate honesty, a willingness to take responsibility for their actions, and the ability to learn from mistakes. Ask about specific instances where they've had to own up to and correct significant errors in their past roles.

10 Situational Judgement interview questions to ask junior employees

Using situational judgement questions helps recruiters assess how junior employees might react in real-world scenarios. This list of questions can guide discussions during interviews, revealing candidates' problem-solving skills and decision-making processes, especially for roles such as software engineers.

1. A team member is struggling with their workload and you're not sure how to help them. What do you do?
2. You overhear two coworkers arguing loudly in the office. How would you handle the situation?
3. Your manager gives you feedback that you strongly disagree with. How do you respond?
4. A customer is confused about how to use your product and reaches out to you for help. What steps do you take?
5. You find out that a project you worked on is going to be delayed. How do you communicate this to your team?
6. During a team project, you notice that one member is not contributing equally. What actions do you take?
7. You have a great idea for improving a process at work, but your boss seems uninterested. How do you proceed?
8. A colleague asks you for help with a task that is outside of your job description. How do you respond?
9. You receive a negative performance review that you believe is unfair. What do you do next?
10. Your team is facing a tight deadline and one member is consistently not meeting their commitments. How do you address this?

10 intermediate Situational Judgement interview questions and answers to ask mid-tier employees

To evaluate the situational judgement of your mid-tier employees, these intermediate questions can provide valuable insights. Use them to understand how candidates think on their feet and handle complex workplace scenarios.

1. How would you handle a situation where a team member is not meeting their deadlines, affecting the project's progress?

First, I'd have a private conversation with the team member to understand the root cause of their delays. It's important to approach the situation with empathy and without assumptions. They might be facing personal issues, workload imbalances, or lack of clarity on tasks.

Next, I'd work with them to develop a plan to get back on track. This could involve reallocating tasks, providing additional resources or training, and setting clear deadlines. Regular check-ins can also help monitor progress and provide support.

What to look for: Strong candidates should demonstrate problem-solving skills, empathy, and the ability to communicate clearly. Look for examples of how they've successfully managed similar situations in the past.

2. Imagine you have to work with a difficult client who often changes their requirements. How would you maintain a positive relationship while ensuring project success?

I would start by setting up a clear communication channel and regular updates to manage expectations. Understanding the client's needs and concerns is crucial, so I would actively listen and confirm requirements in writing to avoid misunderstandings.

To handle changes, I would implement a flexible project management approach, possibly adopting agile methodologies to accommodate evolving requirements. It's also important to educate the client on the impact of changes on timelines and costs.

What to look for: Candidates should show they can balance client satisfaction with project goals. Look for examples of effective communication and flexibility in handling changing requirements.

3. How would you approach a situation where you have to provide negative feedback to a team member who is generally a high performer?

I would ensure the feedback is constructive and specific, focusing on the behavior or issue rather than the person. It's important to provide feedback in a private and respectful manner to maintain their dignity and motivation.

I would also highlight their strengths and contributions to balance the conversation. Providing actionable suggestions for improvement and offering support to achieve these changes is key.

What to look for: Effective feedback delivery is a sign of strong leadership. Candidates should demonstrate empathy, specificity, and a balanced approach in their responses.

4. What steps would you take if you realized a project you're leading is going over budget?

First, I'd conduct a thorough review to identify the reasons for the budget overrun. This includes examining project reports, expenses, and any unforeseen costs.

Next, I'd communicate the situation to stakeholders, providing them with a detailed analysis and possible solutions. Options might include reallocating resources, adjusting project scope, or seeking additional funding.

What to look for: Candidates should show analytical skills, transparency in communication, and the ability to propose feasible solutions. Past experiences in budget management can be a strong indicator of their capability.

5. How do you handle a situation where you disagree with your manager's decision on a project?

I would request a private meeting to discuss my concerns, ensuring I have a clear understanding of their perspective first. It's important to approach the conversation with respect and a willingness to listen.

I would present my viewpoint with supporting data or examples, aiming to have a constructive discussion. If the manager's decision stands, I would align my efforts with their direction while continuously monitoring the project's progress.

What to look for: Candidates should demonstrate respectful communication, the ability to back up their opinions with data, and a willingness to align with management decisions. Look for examples of how they've navigated similar situations.

6. Imagine you're part of a cross-functional team with conflicting priorities. How would you ensure smooth collaboration?

I would start by organizing a meeting with all team members to openly discuss each department's priorities and constraints. It's important to foster a culture of transparency and mutual respect.

Next, I would work towards finding common ground and aligning objectives. This might involve negotiating and compromising on certain aspects to achieve a collaborative plan. Clear communication and regular follow-ups are essential to maintain alignment.

What to look for: Effective collaboration requires negotiation skills, empathy, and the ability to mediate conflicts. Candidates should provide examples of successful cross-functional teamwork.

7. How would you address a situation where your team is resistant to a new process or tool?

I would start by understanding the root cause of the resistance. This could involve one-on-one conversations or team meetings to gather feedback and concerns.

Next, I would provide clear information on the benefits and relevance of the new process or tool. Offering training sessions and resources can help ease the transition. It's important to be patient and supportive throughout the change process.

What to look for: Candidates should demonstrate change management skills, empathy, and the ability to communicate effectively. Look for their past experiences in managing similar transitions.

8. What would you do if you found out a team member is working on a personal project during office hours?

I would have a private conversation with the team member to understand the situation. It's important to approach this with an open mind, as there might be underlying reasons for their behavior.

I would remind them of company policies and the importance of focusing on work tasks during office hours. Offering to help them manage their workload or find a better work-life balance might also be necessary.

What to look for: Candidates should show a balanced approach, combining policy enforcement with empathy. Look for their ability to handle sensitive situations discreetly and effectively.

9. How would you handle a situation where your project is dependent on another team, but they are not delivering as expected?

I would first communicate directly with the other team to understand the reasons for the delay. It's important to approach this with a collaborative mindset rather than blaming.

Next, I would work with them to develop a revised timeline and identify any support they might need from my team. Keeping stakeholders informed about the situation and any adjusted timelines is also crucial.

What to look for: Strong candidates should demonstrate collaboration skills, problem-solving abilities, and effective communication. Look for examples of how they've successfully navigated inter-team dependencies in the past.

10. Describe how you would handle a situation where your team has to quickly adapt to a sudden market change.

I would start by gathering all relevant information about the market change and its potential impact on our projects. This involves quick research and possibly consulting with industry experts or stakeholders.

Next, I would organize a team meeting to discuss the change and brainstorm possible adaptations. Developing a flexible action plan with clear priorities and responsibilities is crucial. Regular updates and agile methodologies can help manage the transition effectively.

What to look for: Candidates should show agility, strategic thinking, and effective team management. Look for their ability to quickly adapt and lead their team through unexpected changes.

12 Situational Judgement interview questions about decision-making scenarios

To effectively assess a candidate's decision-making skills, consider using these situational judgement interview questions. They are designed to give you insights into how applicants handle real-world challenges. For more information on crafting job descriptions, check out this software engineer job description.

1. How would you approach a situation where you have to balance multiple urgent tasks with conflicting deadlines?
2. Imagine you have to make a decision with incomplete information. How do you proceed?
3. You are asked to lead a project in an area outside your expertise. What steps would you take?
4. A key team member unexpectedly resigns right before a major deadline. How do you handle the situation?
5. You receive a request from upper management to prioritize a new project, but your current workload is at capacity. What do you do?
6. You're given two high-priority tasks that both require immediate attention. How do you choose which to tackle first?
7. A decision you made is being questioned by your team. How do you address their concerns while maintaining your stance?
8. You have to decide between two vendors for a critical project, each with its own pros and cons. How do you make your choice?
9. An important project requires cross-department collaboration, but there are existing tensions between the departments. How do you ensure smooth progress?
10. You are given limited resources to complete a project. How do you allocate them effectively?
11. You notice a policy that is causing inefficiencies in your team. How do you propose a change to management?
12. A stakeholder requests a change to a project that will significantly alter its scope. How do you handle this request?

9 Situational Judgement interview questions and answers related to problem-solving

Need to gauge a candidate's problem-solving prowess? Dive into these situational judgment interview questions. They’re crafted to help you identify who’s got the chops to navigate tricky scenarios and who might need a bit more guidance.

1. How do you handle a situation where you have conflicting priorities from different stakeholders?

In cases where stakeholders have conflicting priorities, it’s crucial to maintain clear communication and set expectations. I would start by gathering all the necessary information from each stakeholder to understand their priorities and the reasoning behind them. After assessing the situation, I would schedule a meeting with the stakeholders to discuss the conflicts and find a compromise or a solution that aligns with the overall project goals.

The ideal response will show the candidate's ability to balance multiple demands and their skills in negotiation and conflict resolution. Look for specific examples of past experiences to gauge their effectiveness in similar situations.

2. Describe a time when you had to make a quick decision with limited information. How did you approach it?

When faced with making a quick decision with limited information, I focus on assessing the most critical aspects of the situation. I prioritize understanding the potential risks and benefits of each option. For example, in a previous project, I had to choose between two vendors on short notice. I quickly gathered essential details, consulted with my team for additional insights, and made a well-informed decision that aligned with our project timeline and budget constraints.

An ideal candidate will demonstrate their ability to remain calm under pressure and make informed decisions swiftly. Look for examples that showcase their critical thinking and resourcefulness.

3. How would you handle a situation where you discover a significant issue just before a project deadline?

Upon discovering a significant issue before a project deadline, my first step would be to assess the severity and impact of the problem. I would then communicate the issue to the relevant stakeholders and team members immediately, outlining the potential risks and proposing a contingency plan. For instance, in a previous role, we found a major bug just hours before a product launch. By quickly assembling the team and delegating tasks, we managed to fix the issue and met the deadline successfully.

Candidates should exhibit strong crisis management skills and the ability to stay composed under pressure. Look for examples that demonstrate quick thinking, effective communication, and teamwork.

4. How do you approach a situation where you need to implement a major change, but your team is resistant?

When implementing a major change that faces resistance, I believe in transparent communication and involving the team in the process. I would start by explaining the reasons behind the change and how it aligns with our goals. I’d also address any concerns and gather feedback to make the transition smoother. For instance, I once had to introduce a new software tool that my team was skeptical about. By organizing training sessions and showing the benefits, I managed to get everyone onboard.

An effective response will highlight the candidate’s leadership and communication skills. Look for their ability to empathize with team members and build consensus.

5. What steps would you take if you realized a project is going over budget?

If I notice a project is going over budget, my first step is to conduct a detailed review to identify the root cause. I would evaluate all expenditures, compare them against the budget, and adjust the project plan as needed. I’d also communicate with stakeholders to discuss potential solutions, such as reallocating resources or scaling back non-essential features. For example, in a previous role, I successfully managed budget overruns by renegotiating supplier contracts and cutting unnecessary costs.

The best answers will demonstrate financial acumen, problem-solving skills, and the ability to communicate effectively with stakeholders. Look for candidates who show a proactive approach and experience in budget management.

6. How do you handle a situation where a team member consistently misses deadlines?

When a team member consistently misses deadlines, I would first have a one-on-one conversation to understand any underlying issues. It’s important to listen and provide support, whether through additional training or adjusting workloads. Clear expectations and regular follow-ups are essential. For instance, I once had a team member struggling due to personal issues. By offering flexibility and support, we managed to improve their performance and meet project deadlines.

Look for candidates who demonstrate empathy, strong communication skills, and a proactive approach to resolving performance issues. It’s crucial they show a balance of support and accountability.

7. Imagine you have to mediate a conflict between two team members. How would you approach it?

Mediating a conflict requires a calm and neutral approach. I would start by speaking to each team member individually to understand their perspectives. After gathering information, I’d bring both parties together to discuss the issue openly and find common ground. For instance, I once mediated a conflict over task allocations by facilitating a discussion that led to a more balanced workload distribution and improved team harmony.

The ideal candidate should show strong conflict resolution skills and emotional intelligence. Look for examples where they successfully mediated conflicts and maintained team cohesion.

8. How would you approach a situation where a key stakeholder has unrealistic expectations for a project?

Dealing with unrealistic expectations involves clear and honest communication. I would start by outlining the project's constraints and providing evidence-backed explanations of what’s achievable. It’s essential to manage expectations and negotiate realistic goals. For example, I once had a stakeholder who wanted a complex feature implemented within an unrealistic timeframe. By presenting detailed timelines and resource requirements, we agreed on a phased approach that met their needs without compromising quality.

Candidates should exhibit strong negotiation and communication skills. Look for their ability to manage expectations and maintain positive stakeholder relationships.

9. Describe a situation where you had to delegate tasks effectively under tight deadlines.

Effective delegation under tight deadlines requires clear communication and trust in the team’s abilities. I would start by identifying the most critical tasks and matching them with team members’ strengths. Regular check-ins and support are crucial to ensure progress. For example, during a product launch, I delegated tasks based on expertise and managed to meet the deadline by maintaining constant communication and support.

An ideal response will show the candidate’s ability to prioritize, communicate clearly, and trust their team. Look for examples that demonstrate successful delegation and time management skills.

8 situational Situational Judgement interview questions with answers for hiring top employees

When hiring, it's essential to gauge how candidates handle real-world situations that might arise in your workplace. These situational judgement interview questions will help you identify top employees who can navigate complex scenarios with poise and efficiency. Use this list to gain insights into applicants' problem-solving abilities, interpersonal skills, and capacity for quick decision-making.

1. How would you handle a situation where you have to work with a team that has conflicting priorities?

To handle conflicting priorities, I would first organize a meeting to align the team members on the project goals and deadlines. This helps to establish a clear understanding of what needs to be prioritized and why.

Next, I would facilitate a discussion to hear each team member’s perspective and identify any common ground or potential compromises. The aim is to create a collaborative environment where everyone's input is valued.

Recruiters should look for candidates who demonstrate strong communication and negotiation skills, as well as the ability to foster cooperation and maintain team morale.

2. Imagine you are assigned a task outside of your expertise. How would you approach it?

First, I would break down the task into smaller, manageable components and identify the specific areas where I lack expertise. Then, I would conduct research or seek guidance from colleagues who have more experience in that area.

Additionally, I would look for online resources or training programs to quickly gain the necessary skills. Collaboration with experts or mentoring can also be effective in tackling unfamiliar tasks.

An ideal candidate response should demonstrate a proactive attitude towards learning and problem-solving, as well as resourcefulness in seeking help and acquiring new skills.

3. Describe a time when you had to manage multiple urgent tasks. How did you prioritize them?

In such situations, I typically start by listing all the tasks and their respective deadlines. Then, I assess the impact and urgency of each task to prioritize them effectively. Often, I use a prioritization matrix to categorize tasks based on their importance and urgency.

Once prioritized, I focus on completing the high-impact, high-urgency tasks first. I also communicate with stakeholders to set realistic expectations and seek extensions if necessary for less urgent tasks.

Recruiters should look for candidates who can demonstrate strong organizational skills, the ability to prioritize effectively, and clear communication with stakeholders to manage expectations.

4. How would you handle a situation where you need to provide negative feedback to a team member?

I believe in providing constructive feedback in a private and respectful manner. I would schedule a one-on-one meeting with the team member and start the conversation by highlighting their strengths and contributions.

Then, I would address the specific issue, offering concrete examples and suggesting actionable steps for improvement. I would also encourage the team member to share their perspective and discuss any challenges they might be facing.

An ideal response should show empathy, the ability to offer constructive criticism, and a focus on fostering an environment of continuous improvement.

5. What steps would you take if you realized a project you're leading is going over budget?

First, I would conduct a thorough review of the project expenses to identify the areas contributing to the overrun. This helps in pinpointing any unnecessary costs or inefficiencies.

Next, I would explore cost-saving measures, such as renegotiating with vendors, reallocating resources, or adjusting the project scope. I would also communicate with stakeholders to provide a revised budget and timeline.

Recruiters should look for candidates who can demonstrate strong analytical skills, the ability to manage resources effectively, and proactive communication with stakeholders.

6. How would you address a situation where your team is resistant to a new process or tool?

I would start by clearly explaining the benefits of the new process or tool and how it aligns with the team's goals. Providing a rationale helps in gaining buy-in from the team members.

Next, I would offer training sessions and resources to help the team get up to speed. I would also be open to feedback and willing to make adjustments based on the team’s input.

Ideal candidates should demonstrate the ability to lead change, support their team through transitions, and maintain an open line of communication to address concerns and feedback.

7. Imagine you have to mediate a conflict between two team members. How would you approach it?

To mediate a conflict, I would first meet with each team member individually to understand their perspectives and concerns. This helps in gathering information before facilitating a joint discussion.

During the joint meeting, I would set ground rules for respectful communication and encourage both parties to express their views. The goal is to identify the root cause of the conflict and work towards a mutually agreeable solution.

Recruiters should look for candidates who demonstrate strong interpersonal skills, the ability to remain neutral, and a focus on finding constructive solutions to conflicts.

8. How would you approach a situation where a key stakeholder has unrealistic expectations for a project?

First, I would have a candid conversation with the stakeholder to understand their expectations and provide them with a realistic assessment of what is achievable. It’s important to present data and facts to explain any constraints or challenges.

Next, I would propose alternative solutions that align with the project’s goals and constraints. I would also document the agreed-upon expectations to ensure clarity and alignment moving forward.

Ideal candidates should demonstrate the ability to manage stakeholder expectations, communicate effectively, and propose viable alternatives to unrealistic demands.

Which Situational Judgement skills should you evaluate during the interview phase?

While no single interview can comprehensively evaluate all aspects of a candidate, assessing situational judgement skills is essential. To ensure you are selecting the best fit for your team, here are the core skills to focus on during the interview phase.

Problem-Solving

Problem-solving is a key component of situational judgement as it shows how a candidate approaches challenges and finds solutions. It provides insight into their critical thinking and ability to handle unexpected situations.

You can use problem-solving assessment tests that include multiple-choice questions to effectively filter candidates based on this skill.

To judge this skill, you can ask targeted interview questions that require candidates to think on their feet and provide specific examples of problem-solving in action.

Can you describe a time when you faced a significant problem at work and how you resolved it?

Look for answers that demonstrate a clear, methodical approach to problem-solving, including identification of the problem, analysis of potential solutions, and implementation of the chosen solution.

Decision-Making

Decision-making is crucial in situational judgement as it reveals a candidate's ability to make sound choices under pressure. This skill is essential for roles that require quick thinking and responsible action.

An assessment test with MCQs focused on decision-making scenarios can help identify candidates who excel in this area.

To evaluate decision-making skills, you can ask direct questions that require candidates to explain their decision-making process in previous experiences.

Tell me about a time when you had to make a quick decision without all the necessary information. What was the outcome?

Listen for responses that show the candidate can weigh options effectively, make informed decisions swiftly, and reflect on the outcomes to improve future decisions.

Communication

Effective communication is integral to situational judgement as it ensures that a candidate can articulate their thoughts, provide clear instructions, and work well within a team. Good communication fosters better understanding and collaboration.

Consider using a communication skills assessment with relevant questions to filter candidates who demonstrate strong communication abilities.

Assess communication skills by asking questions that require candidates to explain complex ideas or situations clearly and concisely.

Describe a situation where you had to explain a complex concept to a colleague or client. How did you ensure they understood?

Evaluate if the candidate can break down complex information into understandable terms and check for their ability to engage listeners and confirm understanding.

Use skills tests and interview questions to hire talented candidates

When hiring for roles requiring specific skills, it's important to ensure candidates possess those skills accurately. A thorough assessment process helps in identifying the right talent for your team.

The most effective way to assess these skills is by utilizing targeted skills tests. Explore our Situational Judgement Test or Problem-Solving Test to streamline your hiring process.

After administering the tests, you'll be able to shortlist the best candidates for interviews. This targeted approach makes the selection process more efficient and focused.

To get started, consider signing up on our Adaface platform or visit our test library for a comprehensive range of assessments tailored to your hiring needs.

Download Situational Judgement interview questions template in multiple formats

Download image Download PDF

Download TXT

Situational Judgement Interview Questions FAQs