Search test library by skills or roles
⌘ K

Adaface vs. PXT Select: Detailed In-Depth Comparison Guide

Siddhartha Gunti

August 30, 2024


Pre-employment screening is a must for hiring the right talent. It enables recruiters to evaluate candidates' skills and fit accurately.

This blog post compares Adaface and PXT Select, offering insights to help recruiters choose the best assessment tool for their needs.

Table of contents

How does Adaface work?
How does PXT Select work?
Test libraries
Hiring developers
Candidate experience and company branding
Pricing and free trial
Scorecards, reporting and analytics
Enterprise and startup friendliness
Quality control
Adaface vs PXT Select: Verdict

How does Adaface work?

Adaface is a pre-employment testing platform designed to help companies identify top talent. With a broad range of assessments, it caters to various industries and roles, ensuring accurate evaluation of candidates' skills.

Recruiters use Adaface to streamline their hiring process by leveraging its extensive test library. From coding tests to situational judgment, Adaface provides a wide variety of assessments that help recruiters find the best fit for their roles.

Another reason recruiters choose Adaface is for its ability to create customized tests based on job descriptions. This ensures that the assessments are relevant and accurately measure the skills needed for the specific role.

Adaface's standout features include a vast question bank, support for multiple languages, and advanced proctoring capabilities. These features make it a valuable tool for recruiters looking to enhance their hiring process while ensuring test integrity.

How does PXT Select work?

PXT Select is a pre-employment assessment tool that focuses on evaluating a candidate's cognitive abilities and personality traits. It assists organizations in making informed hiring decisions by matching candidates to job roles based on their unique profiles, aiming for an ideal fit within company culture.

The platform utilizes two main components: the Cognitive Assessment, which tests problem-solving and reasoning abilities, and the Personality Assessment, designed to gauge behavioral traits. For instance, a company looking for sales personnel may evaluate candidates on key traits like decisiveness and sociability, crucial for thriving in a sales environment.

PXT Select is known for its straightforward interface and integration with various Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), making it easy for recruiters to streamline their hiring process. Additionally, it offers reports that help visualize candidates’ strengths and weaknesses, aiding employers in their decision-making.

However, PXT Select lacks a wide variety of specialized tests, such as coding and business scenario assessments. This might limit its effectiveness for roles that require specific skills or situational judgment, which some other platforms provide more comprehensively.

Adaface vs PXT Select: Test libraries

Adaface and PXT Select both offer a variety of tests to gauge skills across different job roles, including business, personality, and aptitude assessments. However, Adaface shines with an expansive range of tests, especially in programming, cloud technologies, and artificial intelligence that PXT Select simply doesn’t provide.

Recruiters can benefit immensely from these test libraries by quickly evaluating candidates' skills before even stepping into interviews. With the right tools, hiring becomes a breeze and improves the likelihood of finding the perfect fit for the team.

Adaface's test library

Adaface test library

Adaface's test library boasts over 500+ assessments across numerous domains, ensuring a tailored evaluation experience. Candidates can be tested on:

Recruiters choose Adaface for its adaptability, allowing them to create a unique assessment fitting their specific needs. Whether it’s role-specific tests for customer service or programming, Adaface ensures that every candidate's evaluation is aligned with the job requirements.

Using Adaface is as easy as pie! Just select the relevant tests, customize the questions if needed, and send them out. You'll receive insightful analytics to help make informed hiring decisions, enabling teams to focus on what really matters – finding that gem amongst the applicants.

PXT Select's test library

PXT Select test library

PXT Select boasts a diverse test library, primarily focusing on aptitude and personality assessments. While it includes business-specific tests for sales roles, it lacks a broader range of job-specific evaluations or technical skills assessments, which are increasingly important in today's hiring landscape.

A notable selling point for PXT Select's test library is its ability to evaluate personality traits alongside cognitive skills. This can be beneficial for roles that require interpersonal skills or sales acumen, helping employers gauge if candidates will mesh well with their teams.

However, aside from its personality and aptitude tests, PXT Select falls short in providing coding assessments or situational judgment tests, which are key for many modern roles. This limitation can be a drawback for companies looking to assess more technical or specialized competencies in candidates.

Comparison of test libraries

FeatureAdafacePXT Select
Programming testsYes (Scenario based MCQs as well as coding questions)No
Situational Judgment testsYesNo
Aptitude testsYesYes
Business testsYesYes (Only for Sales)
Typing testsYesNo
Personality testsYesYes
Language testsYesNo
Finance testsYesNo
Artificial Intelligence testsYesNo
Cloud testsYesNo
Job-specific testsYesYes (Only for Sales)
Custom questionsYesNo
Add your own questionsYesNo
Customized tests per job descriptionYesNo
Ready-to-use testsYesYes

Adaface vs PXT Select: Developer hiring

When hiring developers, recruiters use tests to screen candidates for their technical skills and problem-solving abilities. This ensures that the candidates can meet the specific needs of the team and the projects they'll be working on.

Adaface provides a comprehensive suite of coding questions, MCQs, and framework-specific queries, enabling a thorough evaluation of candidates' skills. PXT Select, while offering some valuable assessments, lacks the depth and variety in coding and technical evaluations that Adaface offers.

Hiring developers with Adaface

Adaface's functionalities for hiring developers include:

  • Web and mobile framework questions
  • Data Structures and Algorithm questions
  • Code playback feature
  • Automated scoring
  • Custom coding question capabilities

Programming tests and other IT tests are also available.

Recruiters use Adaface to hire developers because it provides a balanced mix of coding and multiple-choice questions that accurately assess both practical and theoretical skills. This ensures that candidates not only know how to code but also understand the underlying concepts.

Additionally, Adaface offers features like code playback and automated scoring, making the evaluation process seamless and effective for recruiters. These tools help in saving time and producing accurate assessments without manual intervention. For more information, explore our Pre-Employment Assessment Library for over 500+ skills.

Hiring developers with PXT Select

PXT Select offers a variety of assessments designed primarily for evaluating cognitive skills and personality traits rather than technical prowess. While this approach can be insightful, it lacks direct programming questions essential for assessing developers’ coding abilities.

PXT Select boasts a test library that includes various assessment types, making it easier for employers to gauge candidates' problem-solving capabilities. However, it falls short when it comes to providing a comprehensive selection of programming language or framework-specific questions that truly showcase a developer's technical skills.

One notable gap in PXT Select's offerings is the absence of hands-on coding evaluations and features like code playback, which are crucial for understanding a developer's practical skills. Without these elements, hiring managers might miss out on important insights into a candidate's coding proficiency.

Comparison of developer hiring features

FeatureAdafacePXT Select
Programming language coding questionsYesNo
Web framework questionsYesNo
Mobile framework questionsYesNo
Data Structures and Algorithm questionsYesNo
SQL Coding questionsYesNo
Excel Workbook questionsYesNo
Code playbackYesNo
Automated scoringYesNo
Custom Coding questionsYesNo

Adaface vs PXT Select: Candidate experience and company branding

Candidate experience is more than just a buzzword; it shapes how potential hires perceive your brand. A positive experience can increase completion rates for assessments, ensuring you don't lose out on top talent when they walk away frustrated.

When assessing candidates, consider features like mobile accessibility, support resources, and test length. These components create an inviting environment that encourages candidates to fully engage without unnecessary stress.

Candidate experience and company branding with Adaface

Adaface's assessments are designed with mobile-friendliness in mind. Candidates can take tests on their preferred devices, which enhances completion rates and fosters a comfortable testing atmosphere.

Another standout feature is the email support provided to candidates. This means they have a lifeline for questions, helping demystify the testing process and easing potential anxiety.

Lastly, Adaface includes qualifying questions upfront. This not only helps candidates gauge their fit but also saves time for both parties, ensuring only the best candidates proceed to the full assessment, making it a smoother experience all around.

Candidate experience and company branding with PXT Select

PXT Select offers a straightforward candidate experience, allowing applicants to complete assessments via email invitations. However, candidates are limited to desktop environments since mobile compatibility is not supported, which could hinder accessibility for some users.

A standout feature of PXT Select is its email support for candidates, ensuring they can get assistance if they encounter issues. This can be particularly helpful when candidates have specific questions about the assessment process, enabling a smoother experience overall.

One aspect that PXT Select lacks is a user-friendly help documentation platform. Candidates may find themselves waiting for email replies rather than accessing immediate information, which can lead to frustration during the assessment process.

Adaface vs PXT Select: Pricing and free trial

When it comes to pricing for pre-employment assessment tools, recruiters can expect a range of options from pay-as-you-go to annual subscriptions. The right choice often depends on your hiring volume and budget flexibility.

Adaface pricing

Adaface pricing

Adaface offers transparent pricing options that cater to different company sizes and hiring needs. We have plans that scale with your organization's requirements, ensuring you get the best value.

Our pricing plans are straightforward. Here’s a quick rundown:

  • Starter Plan: $500 for 50 credits
  • Scale Plan: $3000 for 500 credits
  • Growth Plan: $5500 for 1000 credits
  • Enterprise Plan: $20000 for 4000 credits

Companies can explore our platform with a free trial before committing to a plan. This allows you to experience the features and benefits firsthand and decide which plan suits your needs best.

PXT Select pricing

PXT Select Pricing

PXT Select, unlike many other platforms, does not publicly list its pricing details on its website. Instead, users are required to fill out a contact form to receive a pricing quote from the PXT Select team. This can be quite a cumbersome process for recruiters who need quick access to pricing information to make informed decisions. To get started, you'll need to discuss with their sales team to understand which plan fits your needs.

One thing to note is that PXT Select does not offer a free trial, which might be a deal-breaker for those wanting to test out the platform's features before committing. Additionally, there's no straightforward signup process available on the site, making it less convenient for users to explore all the features without an initial sales conversation.

Comparison of pricing

FeatureAdafacePXT Select
Ease of pricing and billingYesNo (Pricing details are not mentioned on the website. Fill the contact form for PXT Select team to provide pricing.)
Free trial?YesNo
Sign upYes-
Explore all featuresYes-
Individual plan180$/ year (unlimited team seats)-
Starter plans500$/ year (unlimited team seats)Contact the team for pricing quote.
Unlimited plans50,000$/ year (unlimited team seats and invites)-

Adaface vs PXT Select: Scorecards, reporting and analytics

Accurate scorecards, insightful reports, and detailed analytics are the backbone of any effective recruitment platform. An ideal product should provide these features to help recruiters make well-informed hiring decisions and streamline the evaluation process.

Adaface scorecards, reporting and analytics

Adaface offers a robust set of features for scorecards, reporting, and analytics. The platform generates detailed PDF reports that recruiters can easily share within their teams or with clients. Adaface also provides public report links, making it simple to share candidates' results without requiring login access.

One standout feature of Adaface is its ability to export data in Excel and CSV formats, facilitating internal evaluations and comparisons. Benchmarking candidates against others in the pool is seamless, with percentile scoring that gives a clear perspective on where each candidate stands.

Adaface's scorecards include a comprehensive skills profile, breaking down candidates' performances across multiple skills. This detailed skill-wise analysis helps recruiters quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement. Additionally, the platform offers a radar chart with candidate scores, industry scores, and company averages for more informed hiring decisions.

Recruiters will appreciate the audit timeline that provides all proctoring logs, ensuring transparency and trust in the assessment process. The platform also features automated scorecard generation and real-time alerts, enabling faster decision-making. You can explore Adaface's sample scorecards to see these features in action and understand how they can benefit your recruitment process.

PXT Select scorecards, reporting and analytics

PXT Select offers a variety of reporting features, including PDF reports and public reports via shareable links. Recruiters can access benchmarking data to compare candidates, although it lacks percentile scoring for a deeper analysis.

The platform provides a skills profile for candidates, making it easier to identify strengths and weaknesses. However, it does not offer a category-wise breakdown, which might limit a detailed assessment of a candidate's performance in specific topics.

One notable omission is the lack of an audit timeline, which could be a bottleneck for thorough proctoring analysis. Additionally, it's unclear if the platform supports automated scorecard generation and alerts, potentially slowing down the hiring process.

Comparison of scorecards, reporting and analytics

FeatureAdafacePXT Select
PDF reportsYesYes
Public reportsYesYes
Excel and CSV reportsYesUnknown
BenchmarkingYesYes (but no percentile scoring)
Skills ProfileYesYes
Skill-wise analysisYesNo
Audit timelineYesNo
Comprehensive OverviewYesYes
Automated scorecard generation and alertsYesUnknown

Adaface vs PXT Select: Enterprise and startup friendliness

An ideal assessment product for enterprises and startups should offer seamless integration with existing systems, maintain compliance standards, and provide flexible user permissions. This ensures the tool can scale with the organization's growth and diverse hiring needs.

Adaface's enterprise and startup friendliness

Adaface stands out with its extensive ATS integrations, enabling enterprises to streamline their hiring processes without leaving their HR platforms. This level of connectivity is vital for large-scale hiring operations.

For startups, Adaface offers unlimited team seats in all plans, ensuring that growing teams can collaborate without worrying about escalating costs. This is particularly helpful for startups aiming to scale rapidly.

Enterprises will also appreciate Adaface's custom data location support, allowing them to meet local data residency requirements. Plus, features like bulk actions simplify mass hiring events, making the platform versatile for both small and large organizations.

PXT Select's enterprise and startup friendliness

PXT Select offers ATS integrations, GDPR compliance, and a custom API, making it a reliable choice for both enterprises and startups. However, it doesn't support custom data location, which may be a deal-breaker for some businesses with specific security needs.

Enterprises can benefit from PXT Select's robust integration options, ensuring a seamless workflow without the need to switch between platforms. Startups can also leverage these features, although they might find the lack of unlimited team seats a bit limiting.

While PXT Select provides several useful features, it lacks options like multiple question sets and tracking candidate stages. These omissions could be critical for companies looking to scale their hiring processes efficiently.

Comparison of enterprise and startup friendliness

FeatureAdafacePXT Select
ATS IntegrationsYesYes
GDPR CompliantYesYes
Custom APIYesYes
Custom data location supportYesNo
Role based accessYesUnknown
Unlimited team seatsYesNo
Multiple invite optionsYes-
Bulk actionsYesUnknown
Priority SupportYesUnknown
Multiple question setsYes-
Track candidate stagesYes-
Uses GenAI for optimizing recruiter workflowsYes-

Adaface vs PXT Select: Assessment quality control

Adaface vs PXT Select: quality control is all about ensuring that assessment results are accurate and trustworthy. Recruiters care about this because high-quality assessments lead to better hiring decisions.

Adaface's quality control features

Adaface employs a meticulous quality control process that includes rigorous checks before any question goes live. This ensures that every question is meaningful and accurately assesses a candidate's skills.

In addition to quality checks, Adaface uses proprietary algorithms and listens to both candidate and customer feedback to continually enhance the test library. This means that assessments are always evolving based on real-world insights.

Recruiters can benefit from features like social listening, which helps detect and remove leaked questions, ensuring the integrity of the tests. With Adaface, users can explore the science behind our tests to understand how we maintain top-notch quality.

PXT Select's quality control features

PXT Select conducts quality checks before questions go live on their platform. This process helps ensure that the questions added are relevant and useful for assessing candidate skills.

The platform uses psychometric test theory to measure behavior and personality traits. Every candidate takes the same assessment, which aims to provide consistent results across all test-takers.

However, there's limited information available about how often PXT Select updates its question bank or incorporates user feedback. It's also unclear if they have measures in place to prevent question overexposure or to monitor social media for potential leaks.

Comparison of quality control

FeatureAdafacePXT Select
Candidate feedback to improve testsYesNo
Social ListeningYesNo
Quality checks before questions go liveYesYes
Replacing questions based on limitsYesNo
Customer feedback to improve testsYesNo
Proprietary algorithms to improve quality of questionsYesNo

Adaface vs PXT Select: Final verdict

Both Adaface and PXT Select offer aptitude and personality tests, helping recruiters identify the most suitable candidates.

Despite these similarities, Adaface stands out with its broader range of tests and customizability.

PXT Select lacks programming, situational judgment, and language tests, which are essential for a holistic candidate evaluation.

Streamline hiring with skill tests

Adaface covers these areas comprehensively and offers customizable tests tailored to specific job descriptions, enhancing precision in hiring.

Pre-employment assessments streamline the hiring process by providing objective data on candidate skills and fit.

Recruiters benefit from efficient screening, reduced bias, and improved hiring decisions using these tools.

Adaface is the go-to solution with its extensive test library and customizable assessments. To learn more, check out our Adaface Online Assessment Platform.

Adaface vs PXT Select FAQs

What types of tests do Adaface and PXT Select offer?

Adaface offers a wide range including programming, situational judgment, aptitude, business, typing, personality, language, finance, AI, and cloud tests. PXT Select mainly offers aptitude and personality tests.

Can I customize questions on Adaface and PXT Select?

Adaface allows you to add custom questions and create tailored tests. PXT Select does not support custom questions.

Are language tests available on both platforms?

Adaface provides multiple language tests, while PXT Select does not offer any language tests.

How do both platforms support candidate experience?

Adaface offers a conversational interface and mobile-friendly tests. PXT Select does not have a conversational interface and is not mobile-friendly.

Do both platforms integrate with ATS systems?

Yes, both Adaface and PXT Select integrate with popular ATS systems.

What are the pricing and trial options?

Adaface offers transparent pricing and a free trial. PXT Select requires contacting their team for pricing and does not offer a free trial.


Adaface logo dark mode

40 min skill tests.
No trick questions.
Accurate shortlisting.

We make it easy for you to find the best candidates in your pipeline with a 40 min skills test.

Try for free

Related posts

customers across world
Join 1500+ companies in 80+ countries.
Try the most candidate friendly skills assessment tool today.
g2 badges
logo
40 min tests.
No trick questions.
Accurate shortlisting.