Adaface vs. HackerEarth: Detailed In-Depth Comparison Guide

How does Adaface work?

Adaface is a cutting-edge online assessment platform designed to speed up and simplify the hiring process while ensuring top-tier talent acquisition.

Recruiters turn to Adaface for its unique conversational assessments which make candidates feel at ease, providing a more accurate reflection of their skills and potential.

Another reason recruiters prefer Adaface is its proficiency in creating custom tests tailored to specific job descriptions, ensuring a precise match between candidate skills and job requirements.

Adaface's proctoring features ensure accurate assessments by monitoring candidates through webcam and screen tracking, safeguarding the integrity of the testing process.

How does HackerEarth work?

HackerEarth offers a comprehensive platform for technical hiring, focusing heavily on coding assessments. It's a popular choice for companies looking to evaluate programming skills in potential hires.

HackerEarth primarily uses coding challenges to screen candidates. These coding challenges cover a variety of programming languages and data structures, aiming to test the practical skills of the applicant in a straightforward, hands-on manner.

Some of HackerEarth's standout features include code playback and automated scoring, which help streamline the evaluation process for recruiters. They also allow companies to add their own questions, providing some level of customization.

However, HackerEarth lacks situational judgment and aptitude tests, which can be a drawback for companies looking to assess non-technical skills. Additionally, they don't offer personality or language tests, which could be critical for roles requiring a more holistic evaluation.

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Test libraries

Adaface's library offers a versatile range of tests, covering technical skills like programming and cloud computing, as well as aptitude, situational judgment, and personality assessments. HackerEarth primarily focuses on programming assessments, with limited offerings in other skill categories.

Using these test libraries allows recruiters to evaluate candidates' abilities effectively before the interview stage. By leveraging diverse and tailored assessments, hiring managers can make more informed decisions and lower employee turnover rates.

Adaface's test library

Adaface's test library includes assessments for:

• Programming

• Artificial Intelligence

• Role-specific skills

• Finance

• Personality

• Languages

Recruiters use Adaface's test library to tailor assessments to job descriptions, achieving a more accurate evaluation of candidate fit. This customization extends to creating scenario-based questions for specific roles like customer service or marketing.

To see Adaface's library in action, easily navigate through various test categories and select the assessments best suited for your hiring needs. You can even add custom questions to ensure the tests precisely match your requirements.

HackerEarth's test library

HackerEarth offers a test library focused primarily on programming skills, featuring a range of coding assessments tailored for various software development roles. While there are scenario-based MCQs included, the library is somewhat limited in scope.

A key selling point of HackerEarth's test library is its ability to evaluate candidates through practical coding challenges. This can help employers identify developers who can effectively solve real-world problems, which is definitely a plus in the hiring process.

However, HackerEarth's library lacks a variety of assessments, such as situational judgment and personality tests, which are essential for understanding a candidate's soft skills and cultural fit within a team. This absence could leave gaps in evaluating well-rounded candidates.

Comparison of test libraries

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Developer hiring

Recruiters use coding tests to screen developers and find the best talent. Both Adaface and HackerEarth offer tools for this purpose.

Adaface provides a mix of coding questions and multiple-choice tests on programming scenarios. This combo helps assess hands-on skills and theoretical knowledge in a time-efficient way.

Hiring developers with Adaface

Adaface's test library includes:

• Programming language tests (Python, Java, etc.)
• Web and mobile framework questions
• Data structures and algorithms assessments
• SQL coding and Excel workbook challenges

Recruiters can use Adaface to create custom coding tests tailored to their specific job requirements. This allows them to evaluate candidates on skills directly relevant to the role.

Adaface also offers automated scoring and code playback features. These tools help hiring managers review candidate performance quickly and accurately without manual code reviews.

Hiring developers with HackerEarth

HackerEarth provides a range of programming assessments that help companies vet developers for various technical roles. Their platform includes questions on programming languages, web frameworks, and data structures and algorithms, catering to different developer skill sets.

With its extensive test library, HackerEarth offers a variety of coding challenges that allow companies to assess candidates' problem-solving abilities. Recruiters can pick from existing tasks or create custom coding questions to tailor the assessment process to their specific needs.

However, HackerEarth's offerings fall short when it comes to mobile frameworks and SQL coding questions. Additionally, while they provide code playback and automated scoring, other nuanced features that aid in detailed candidate evaluation are missing.

Comparison of developer hiring features

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Candidate experience and company branding

Candidate experience and company branding are two sides of the same coin in the recruitment process. When done right, they ensure candidates have a positive impression of your company, which can directly influence their decision to join.

Features like mobile-friendliness, quick support, and brand customization play a big role in enhancing the candidate experience. These elements come together to create a seamless and engaging process, ultimately reflecting well on the company.

Candidate experience and company branding with Adaface

Adaface stands out with its conversational interface, redefining how candidates perceive assessments. This interactive approach not only makes the test feel less daunting but also more engaging, increasing completion rates.

Adaface supports mobile-friendly assessments, enabling candidates to take tests on any device. This flexibility is particularly useful for those who might not have immediate access to a computer, making the process more inclusive.

Brand customization is another feature where Adaface shines. You can incorporate your company’s logo and colors into the test interface, ensuring a cohesive brand experience throughout the assessment process. This subtle touch enhances your company’s professionalism and appeal.

Candidate experience and company branding with HackerEarth

HackerEarth offers a traditional assessment experience that can feel a bit clunky for candidates. With assessments taking around two hours, many might find themselves losing interest before reaching the finish line. While email support and help documentation are available, it lacks a conversational interface that could make tests feel more engaging and friendly.

In terms of company branding, HackerEarth allows employers to display their logo and brand colors during the assessment process. However, customization options for invitation and rejection emails are limited, which means companies might miss out on reinforcing their brand messaging throughout the candidate journey.

A strong candidate experience, paired with effective company branding, can make a lasting impression. For instance, having customizable templates for all candidate communications would provide a seamless branding experience and encourage a positive perception of the company, even for those who may not make it through the hiring process. Yet, HackerEarth misses the mark by not offering customizable rejection templates, leaving candidates with generic messaging and a less personalized touch.

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Anti-cheating features

Online testing is convenient but also poses a risk of candidates getting an unfair advantage through cheating. To maintain the integrity of assessments, pre-employment testing services should have strong anti-cheating features. Proctoring tools ensure that tests fairly reflect candidates’ true abilities.

Anti-cheating features of Adaface

Adaface employs a robust set of anti-cheating features to ensure the integrity of its assessments. These include time limits on tests, web proctoring, and IP proctoring. Plagiarism detection and copy-paste protection also help to maintain fair testing conditions.

Adaface’s proctoring features go a step further by offering webcam proctoring and full-screen proctoring. This ensures that candidates remain engaged with the test and aren’t seeking external help. Device fingerprinting adds another layer of security, making it difficult for multiple candidates to use the same device.

Location logging and ChatGPT protection are additional measures that Adaface uses to keep the assessments fair. Location logging helps track where the test is being taken, while ChatGPT protection monitors the use of AI tools during the test.

Learn more about Adaface's remote proctoring features and how they ensure accurate assessments. You can also read everything you should know about online proctoring.

Anti-cheating features of HackerEarth

HackerEarth has several anti-cheating features in place. They offer user authentication, time limits on tests, and both web and webcam proctoring to ensure candidates are who they say they are and are taking the test honestly.

These features are particularly useful for preventing candidates from easily switching tabs or getting external help during the test. For example, webcam proctoring can catch if someone else is in the room assisting the test-taker.

However, HackerEarth lacks some proctoring measures that could enhance test security further. They don't have full-screen proctoring or device fingerprinting, which means candidates might still find ways to cheat using multiple devices or windows.

Comparison of anti-cheating features

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Pricing and free trial

When considering pricing for assessment platforms, recruiters should expect a range of options tailored to different hiring needs. These can include pay-as-you-go plans, monthly subscriptions, and annual packages.

Adaface pricing

At Adaface, we offer a variety of pricing plans that cater to businesses of all sizes. Our plans are designed to be transparent and flexible, ensuring you get the best value for your investment.

Our pricing tiers include:

• Starter: $500 for 50 credits

• Scale: $3000 for 500 credits

• Growth: $5500 for 1000 credits

• Enterprise: $20000 for 400 credits

• Unlimited: $50000 per year

Explore our pricing to find the plan that suits your needs.

Adaface offers a free trial so you can explore all features before making a decision. Our easy signup process allows you to get started without unnecessary delays. Choose the plan that aligns with your hiring volume and budget. Whether you're a startup or an enterprise, our flexible options have got you covered.

HackerEarth pricing

HackerEarth provides several pricing plans to cater to different user needs. The options include:

• Starter Plan: $209 per month for one recruiter seat.
• Growth Plan: Pricing available upon request, typically includes more features for larger teams.
• Scale Plan: Custom pricing based on candidate assessment needs.
• Enterprise Plans: These are tailored to large organizations but require direct contact for pricing details. While these plans can fit various hiring scenarios, the lack of a clearly defined structure can make it tricky to instantly know which option suits your needs best.

One notable aspect missing from HackerEarth's pricing is the absence of unlimited candidate assessment plans. This could lead to limitations, especially for organizations with high hiring volumes. Furthermore, potential users might find navigating through the pricing tiers a bit cumbersome since some plans require direct inquiry for specifics. A more straightforward approach could make it easier for recruiters to evaluate options without having to jump through hoops or wait for callbacks.

Comparison of pricing

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Scorecards, reporting and analytics

Recruiters need a product with excellent scorecards, reporting, and analytics features to make informed hiring decisions. The ideal tool provides clarity on candidate performance, allows data sharing, and ensures comprehensive analysis.

Adaface scorecards, reporting and analytics

Adaface offers detailed scorecards and reports, including PDF, Excel, and CSV formats. These reports feature skill-wise analysis and benchmarking, providing a clear view of each candidate's performance.

One standout feature is Adaface's public scorecard links. Recruiters can share unique links with clients or team members, ensuring easy access without needing a login. View samples like the aptitude-test-graphic-designer-assessment scorecard and the ansible-and-jenkins-online-test-assessment scorecard to see the detailed breakdown.

Adaface also provides a detailed audit timeline for proctoring logs, ensuring transparency. The automated generation of scorecards and real-time alerts help recruiters move faster in the hiring process.

HackerEarth scorecards, reporting and analytics

HackerEarth offers assessment reports for each candidate, including overall scores and detailed breakdowns for programming questions. These reports show candidate scores, test completion time, and the number of attempts made for each question.

The platform includes a benchmarking feature that allows users to compare candidates and spot top performers. Reports can be shared with the hiring team via a shareable link or downloadable file, though the available file formats aren't specified.

While HackerEarth provides useful reporting features, it may lack some capabilities. For instance, it's unclear if the platform offers PDF exports, public report sharing, or Excel/CSV downloads for more flexible data analysis.

Comparison of scorecards, reporting and analytics

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Enterprise and startup friendliness

When considering assessment tools for both enterprises and startups, it's important to seek platforms with ATS integrations, GDPR compliance, and scalable features. These functionalities ensure smooth operations and compliance as your organization grows.

Adaface's enterprise and startup friendliness

Adaface offers unlimited team seats across all plans, a feature that ensures larger teams don't face inflated pricing. This is particularly useful for enterprises managing extensive recruitment processes.

Additionally, Adaface provides custom data location support, allowing enterprises to store data in their preferred regions. This feature is not available with HackerEarth, making Adaface a more flexible option for data-sensitive companies.

For startups, Adaface shines with its multiple invite options and role-based access, allowing even smaller teams to optimize their recruitment workflows. To learn more about how Adaface supports startups, check out our Recruiting for Startups guide.

HackerEarth's enterprise and startup friendliness

HackerEarth offers a suite of features that cater to both enterprises and startups, including ATS integrations, GDPR compliance, and role-based access. Their platform allows for multiple ways to invite candidates, enhancing flexibility for recruitment processes.

For enterprises, HackerEarth's capabilities enable large-scale assessments, making it a go-to choice for organizations looking to streamline their hiring. Startups can also benefit from these features, allowing them to level the playing field against larger competitors.

However, HackerEarth lacks certain functionalities that could enhance the hiring experience, such as bulk actions for mass hiring and options for custom data locations. These gaps can hinder organizations aiming for seamless recruitment workflows.

Comparison of enterprise and startup friendliness

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Assessment quality control

When it comes to assessments, quality control ensures that the tests you use are accurate, reliable, and fair. For recruiters, this means trusting that the results truly reflect a candidate's skills and abilities, leading to better hiring decisions.

Adaface's quality control features

Adaface prioritizes quality control with rigorous processes in place before any question goes live. Each question undergoes quality checks to ensure it effectively assesses the intended skills.

What sets Adaface apart is the proactive approach to maintaining question integrity. By utilizing social listening, the platform monitors for any leaks, ensuring that questions remain valid and non-googleable.

Recruiters can also benefit from Adaface's unique algorithms designed to evaluate question quality continuously. This means that as new feedback comes in from candidates and customers, the test library evolves, providing an optimal assessment experience. To learn more about the science behind our tests, check out the science page.

HackerEarth's quality control features

HackerEarth has a quality control process in place to ensure their assessment platform remains reliable. They perform quality checks before questions go live on their platform, helping to maintain a standard of relevance and accuracy in their test library.

The platform uses a team of subject matter experts to create and review content. This approach aims to keep their questions up-to-date with industry standards and technological advancements.

However, it's unclear whether HackerEarth incorporates candidate or customer feedback into their quality improvement process. There's also no information available about whether they use social listening or have systems in place to replace questions based on usage limits.

Comparison of quality control

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Customer support

When it comes to assessment platforms, customer support is like a safety net for recruiters. It ensures you have help at hand while navigating through the hiring process, making it smoother and less daunting.

Adaface's customer support features

Adaface shines with a variety of support options including email, live chat, and a detailed help center. This means recruiters can always find answers to their questions quickly and easily.

For those on enterprise plans, Adaface offers dedicated priority support, ensuring that larger organizations have a direct line to customer success. Additionally, all users benefit from training and onboarding, making it easy to get started.

Plus, with phone assistance available, recruiters can reach out directly for immediate support when needed. To explore more about how Adaface can enhance your hiring process, check out our product tour and the help center for detailed guidance.

HackerEarth's customer support features

HackerEarth provides email support and a help center for users to find answers and how-to guides.

However, they lack live chat and dedicated priority support, which could make immediate assistance a challenge for users.

Comparison of customer support

Adaface vs HackerEarth: Final verdict

Both Adaface and HackerEarth offer coding tests and job-specific assessments for technical roles. They provide automated scoring and code playback features to evaluate programming skills.

However, Adaface stands out with its wider range of tests. It covers aptitude, business skills, and personality assessments. This makes Adaface more versatile for hiring across different departments.

HackerEarth focuses mainly on developer hiring, with longer 2-hour assessments. Adaface offers shorter 40-minute tests, which can improve candidate experience and completion rates.

Streamline hiring with skill tests

Adaface provides a more candidate-friendly experience with its conversational interface and mobile support. It also offers custom tests based on job descriptions, ensuring a better fit for each role.

Pre-employment assessments help recruiters evaluate candidates objectively. They test job-specific skills, cognitive abilities, and cultural fit to find the best match for each position.

These tools save time in the hiring process by quickly comparing applicants. They also reduce bias by focusing on skills rather than resumes.

For most companies, Adaface is the more flexible choice. Its diverse test library and customization options make it suitable for hiring across various roles and industries. To learn more, check out Adaface's plans or try a free demo.