Adaface vs. Central Test

How does Adaface work?

Adaface is a pre-employment screening platform that offers a wide range of assessments. It focuses on conversational assessments to enhance the candidate experience.

Recruiters use Adaface to evaluate candidates across multiple skills with customized tests tailored to specific job descriptions. This approach ensures a precise match between the candidate's abilities and the job requirements.

Another reason recruiters love Adaface is the variety of question types, including coding challenges, aptitude tests, and personality assessments. This allows for a well-rounded evaluation of each candidate.

Adaface also excels in features like remote proctoring to ensure test integrity. With options such as webcam proctoring and extensive integrations, recruiters have all the tools they need to make informed hiring decisions.

How does Central Test work?

Central Test is an assessment platform designed to evaluate various skills and traits, offering a mix of aptitude and personality tests. It aims to help employers make informed hiring decisions by providing detailed insights into candidates' abilities.

The platform operates through a range of pre-designed tests that can be applied to different hiring scenarios. These tests might include programming languages, English, French, and German proficiency assessments, as well as personality evaluations.

Central Test stands out with its extensive library of personality tests, providing valuable insights into candidate behavior and potential cultural fit. It’s a good option for companies looking to prioritally assess interpersonal and emotional skills.

However, Central Test lacks support for custom questions and doesn't offer coding assessments, which could limit its versatility in evaluating technical candidates comprehensively.

Adaface vs Central Test: Test libraries

Adaface's test library boasts a wide array of assessments, from technical skills like coding to soft skills such as situational judgment. Central Test, while offering a variety of tests, lacks coding questions and certain categories like business and finance tests.

For recruiters, using these test libraries streamlines the hiring process by providing ready-to-use assessments tailored to specific job roles. This not only saves time but ensures that candidates are evaluated on relevant skills before the interview stage.

Adaface's test library

Adaface's test library is a treasure trove for recruiters, featuring:

• Programming tests

• Aptitude tests

• Business tests

• Language tests

• Artificial Intelligence tests

Recruiters love Adaface's test library for its diverse range, helping them assess everything from technical prowess to business acumen. It's especially useful for roles requiring specific skill sets, such as Digital Marketing and Customer Service.

Adaface's library in action means custom tests per job description, ensuring each assessment is relevant to the role and well-rounded. An example is the Graphic Design Aptitude Test, which combines scenario-based MCQs and design challenges to gauge a candidate's skill perfectly.

Central Test's test library

Central Test offers a variety of assessments, including programming tests that focus on scenario-based multiple-choice questions but lack hands-on coding challenges. Their library also includes aptitude and personality tests, catering to a range of skills, albeit with some notable gaps.

The selling point for Central Test's library is its structured approach to evaluating candidates through situational judgment tests and personality assessments, making it a go-to for understanding a candidate's thought process and behavioral tendencies in professional scenarios.

However, Central Test misses out on job-specific assessments and the ability for customization, which can limit recruiters looking for tailored evaluations that align closely with their specific job descriptions and company needs.

Comparison of test libraries

Adaface vs Central Test: Developer hiring

When hiring developers, assessing a candidate’s full range of technical skills is key to finding the perfect fit for your team.

Adaface and Central Test both offer numerous functionalities to help recruiters evaluate applicants’ technical abilities and coding languages.

Hiring developers with Adaface

Adaface offers a robust test library tailored for hiring developers, featuring both coding questions and scenario-based MCQs.

Central Test, on the other hand, provides coding and web framework questions but lacks some of the more comprehensive evaluation tools available in Adaface.

Adaface’s test library includes:

• Programming language coding questions

• Web framework questions

• Mobile framework questions

• Data Structures and Algorithm questions

• SQL Coding questions

Recruiters use Adaface to hire developers because it offers a balanced mix of coding and MCQs, allowing for more accurate skill assessments.

Additionally, features like code playback and custom coding questions make it easier for recruiters to tailor tests to specific roles, ensuring a better match for their development team's needs.

Hiring developers with Central Test

Central Test provides a variety of assessment options but does not focus on coding questions for evaluating developers. They cover programming language and web/mobile framework questions but lack hands-on coding tasks.

Their test library includes multiple-choice questions related to programming scenarios. This can be useful for quickly gauging theoretical knowledge without diving deep into practical coding skills.

However, you might find some gaps in assessing real-world coding abilities, like SQL coding questions, data structure tasks, or code playback features. Custom coding questions are also not supported, which can limit flexibility.

Comparison of developer hiring features

Adaface vs Central Test: Candidate experience and company branding

The candidate experience can make or break your hiring process. If candidates feel frustrated or disengaged, they might not complete the assessment, leaving you with fewer qualified applicants.

What should you look for in a candidate assessment platform? Consider factors like mobile-friendliness, test length, and support options. These features can significantly impact candidate satisfaction and completion rates.

Candidate experience and company branding with Adaface

Adaface's conversational interface creates a more engaging experience for candidates. Unlike traditional assessments, the conversational style feels more like a friendly chat, reducing candidate anxiety and abandonment rates.

Mobile support is another standout feature of Adaface. Candidates can take tests on their mobile devices, making it convenient for those on the go. This flexibility can increase completion rates by allowing candidates to take assessments whenever it's most convenient for them.

Lastly, Adaface provides robust support, including email support and extensive help documentation. This ensures that candidates can quickly resolve any issues or questions, allowing for a smoother assessment experience. For more insights on enhancing candidate experience, check out how to enhance candidate experience for Gen Z.

Candidate experience and company branding with Central Test

Central Test offers a traditional assessment experience, where candidates can expect tests that range from 5 to 40 minutes. However, the lack of a conversational interface may make the experience feel more like a chore than an engaging interaction. Candidates can access a standard help document, but support is limited to email replies, which can be slow and cumbersome.

One of the standout features of Central Test is its assessment length, which accommodates various candidate schedules. Shorter tests can keep candidates interested while still providing essential insights into their skills. This focus on timing can help employers maintain a high candidate engagement rate throughout the hiring process.

While Central Test has a good structure, it lacks mobile-friendly options for all assessments, which could limit accessibility for some candidates. The absence of qualifying questions means candidates might spend time on tests that don't align with their skills, potentially leading to frustration. This could be a missed opportunity for creating a more tailored and user-friendly candidate journey.

Adaface vs Central Test: Anti-cheating features

Ensuring candidates don't cheat during online assessments is key to maintaining the integrity of the hiring process. Ideal proctoring features should include robust tools to monitor and track candidate activity, ensuring fair and reliable results.

Anti-cheating features of Adaface

Adaface shines with its myriad of anti-cheating tools designed to keep assessments secure and honest. The platform offers:

• Non-googleable questions
• Browser tab tracking
• Webcam monitoring
• IP and location logging
• Device fingerprinting
• Copy-paste protection
• Full-screen enforcement
• Chat GPT detection
• Large question bank
• Plagiarism detection.

One standout feature is Adaface's use of webcam proctoring. This ensures that the candidate is present throughout the test, and no one else is assisting. The webcam continuously captures images, giving recruiters confidence in the test's authenticity.

Additionally, Adaface's IP proctoring and device fingerprinting track the candidate's device and location. This means if two candidates attempt to use the same device or IP address, it's flagged for recruiter review, adding another layer of security.

For a deeper dive on how Adaface's proctoring features work, check out our guide.

Anti-cheating features of Central Test

Central Test offers basic proctoring features like time-limited tests and randomized question orders. This ensures that every candidate is presented with a slightly different set of questions, making it harder to share answers.

These features are particularly useful for maintaining the fairness of the assessment process. They help in preventing candidates from collaborating or looking up answers online, ensuring that the results reflect individual performance.

However, Central Test lacks more advanced anti-cheating measures like user authentication, webcam monitoring, and IP tracking. Such additional layers of security are important for a more comprehensive approach to preventing dishonest practices.

Comparison of anti-cheating features

Adaface vs Central Test: Pricing and free trial

When it comes to pricing for assessment tools, recruiters can expect a range of options depending on the scale and specific needs of their hiring processes. Most providers offer tiered plans to cater to different recruitment volumes and budgets.

Adaface pricing

Adaface offers a variety of pricing plans to fit various hiring needs, ensuring flexibility and scalability. Our plans are designed to accommodate startups to large enterprises, making it easy to find a suitable option.

Our pricing structure includes four main plans: Starter at $500 for 50 credits, Scale at $3000 for 500 credits, Growth at $5500 for 1000 credits, and Enterprise at $20000 for 4000 credits. Each plan is crafted to provide value and support different levels of recruitment efforts.

For those looking to explore Adaface before committing, we also offer a free trial. This allows recruiters to experience our platform's features and functionalities without any initial cost. For detailed pricing information, visit our pricing page.

Central Test pricing

Central Test doesn't publicly list its pricing details on its website, which means you'll need to fill out a contact form or sign up to get a quote. A free 15-day trial is available for those who want to test the platform before committing. To find out the specific plans and costs, potential users must engage with the Central Test team, adding an extra step to the process.

While Central Test offers a free trial, the lack of transparent pricing on their website can be a hurdle for recruiters looking to quickly compare costs and features. The absence of an easy sign-up option and the inability to explore all features without prior contact can also slow down the evaluation process.

Comparison of pricing

Adaface vs Central Test: Enterprise and startup friendliness

An ideal product for both enterprises and startups should seamlessly integrate with existing workflows, ensure data security, and offer features that scale with the organization's needs. Flexibility and customization options are key to catering to diverse business requirements.

Adaface's enterprise and startup friendliness

Adaface excels in enterprise friendliness by offering seamless ATS integrations with all popular systems, ensuring smooth HR processes. Additionally, Adaface's GDPR compliance makes it a reliable choice for businesses concerned about data protection and privacy.

For large-scale hiring needs, Adaface provides bulk action capabilities, allowing recruiters to manage multiple candidates efficiently. Moreover, the custom API offered by Adaface enables tight integration into unique workflows, a feature not available with Central Test.

Startups benefit from Adaface's provision of unlimited team seats in all plans. This ensures that growing teams can collaborate without additional costs, making Adaface a cost-effective solution for budding enterprises. For more on startup recruiting strategies, check out this Recruiting for Startups: 7 Things You Need to Do.

Central Test's enterprise and startup friendliness

Central Test offers a variety of features suitable for both enterprise and startup environments, such as ATS integrations and GDPR compliance. However, it lacks a custom API and doesn't cater to custom data location requests, which can be pivotal for larger organizations.

The ATS integration is a notable selling point for businesses looking to streamline their hiring processes. This allows companies to manage assessments without needing to juggle multiple platforms, but without a custom API, integration options may feel limited for some.

While Central Test provides some solid tools, it falls short in offering features like unlimited team seats and multiple question sets. Companies looking for flexibility and scalability might find themselves wishing for a more comprehensive solution.

Comparison of enterprise and startup friendliness

Adaface vs Central Test: Conclusion

Adaface and Central Test both offer a variety of pre-employment assessments covering different skills and job roles.

Even with similar features, Adaface stands out due to its range of customizable and scenario-based questions that provide a more comprehensive evaluation of candidates.

Central Test lacks several key features like situational judgment tests, business tests, and cloud tests, which are essential for a well-rounded assessment experience.

Streamline hiring with skill tests

Adaface, on the other hand, offers these tests along with custom questions, coding questions, and a conversational interface, making it a more versatile and candidate-friendly platform.

Pre-employment assessments streamline hiring by evaluating candidates' skills, reducing bias, and saving time.

Recruiters benefit from these assessments by getting detailed insights into candidates' abilities, helping them make better hiring decisions.

Adaface emerges as the superior choice due to its extensive test library and customizable options. Ready to enhance your hiring process? Check out Adaface Platform Features or dive into our blog on pre-employment assessments for more insights.