Adaface vs. 123test: Which Assessment Platform is Right for You?

How does Adaface work?

Adaface is an online assessment platform that helps companies hire top talent. It offers a wide range of tests covering programming, aptitude, personality, and job-specific skills.

Recruiters use Adaface to create customized assessments tailored to specific job roles. The platform's conversational interface makes the testing experience engaging for candidates, potentially improving completion rates.

The platform provides detailed candidate scorecards with skill-wise breakdowns. This helps recruiters quickly identify the best candidates to move forward in the hiring process.

Adaface incorporates several anti-cheating measures like webcam proctoring, browser tracking, and plagiarism detection. These features help ensure the integrity of test results, giving recruiters confidence in their hiring decisions.

How does 123test work?

123test is a digital platform that offers various pre-employment assessments. These tests are designed to help employers evaluate potential hires on different skills and attributes.

The platform focuses on aptitude and personality tests. Employers can use these standardised tests to understand a candidate's cognitive abilities and personality traits.

Among its notable features, 123test includes a broad range of aptitude tests. These tests cover areas such as logical reasoning, numerical ability, and verbal skills, providing a well-rounded view of a candidate's competencies.

However, 123test lacks certain customization options and advanced features. The platform doesn’t support creating custom questions, scenario-based assessments, or industry-specific tests which can be a drawback for some recruiters.

Adaface vs 123test: Test libraries

Adaface and 123test both offer a variety of tests to assess candidates across different domains such as programming, aptitude, and personality. However, Adaface's library is more comprehensive, featuring custom-built tests that cater to specific job roles, alongside other unique offerings such as coding questions and situational judgment assessments.

For recruiters, leveraging these test libraries can drastically improve the quality of candidate selection, allowing for better informed hiring decisions. With an extensive range of subjects and skills assessed, recruiters can find the perfect fit for their organization's needs.

Adaface's test library

Adaface's test library is impressive, boasting over 500+ pre-employment assessments covering cognitive skills, technical proficiencies, and creative thinking—tailored for approximately 500 skills! Unique to Adaface are customizable tests based on job descriptions, ensuring relevance for each candidate's evaluation.

Recruiters love using Adaface because they can optimize their hiring process by utilizing our diverse tests, including those for programming, personality, and language proficiency. The integration of situational judgment testing enables a clearer insight into a candidate's real-world application of skills.

Imagine, with just a few clicks, you can set up and deploy custom tests on Adaface, whether it’s assessing a developer's coding skills or evaluating a project manager's decision-making capabilities. Start exploring our Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library to discover how Adaface can enhance your recruiting strategy!

123test's test library

123test offers a variety of assessments, including aptitude and personality tests, catering to candidates' cognitive abilities and traits. Their library is designed to help employers gauge a candidate's potential through multiple-choice questions and standardized tests.

A key selling point of 123test's library is its user-friendly structure, allowing employers to quickly deploy tests for assessing basic skills. This can be particularly useful for companies looking to streamline their hiring process without diving too deep into technical evaluations.

However, 123test lacks a range of job-specific and technical assessments, which can limit its applicability for roles that require specific skills like programming or situational judgment. This absence might make it challenging for employers to evaluate candidates in a more nuanced way.

Comparison of test libraries

Adaface vs 123test: Developer hiring

When hiring developers, having a robust assessment tool is critical. Tests help screen a candidate's full range of technical skills and ensure they're a fit for your team and workload.

Both Adaface and 123test offer functionalities for assessing developer skills. However, Adaface stands out with its combination of coding questions, web and mobile framework questions, and more. In contrast, 123test lacks several key functionalities, such as coding questions and automated scoring.

Hiring developers with Adaface

Adaface is designed with recruiters in mind, offering a comprehensive range of functionalities for hiring developers.

These include:

• Programming language coding questions

• Web and mobile framework questions

• Data structures and algorithm questions

• SQL coding and Excel workbook questions

• Code playback and automated scoring

• Custom coding questions

Recruiters choose Adaface because it offers a nuanced approach to assessing technical skills, combining coding challenges with scenario-based MCQs. This provides a more rounded view of a candidate's capabilities.

Additionally, Adaface's feature set, including custom coding questions and automated scoring, makes it easier and faster for hiring managers to evaluate candidates effectively.

Hiring developers with 123test

123test does not offer programming assessments tailored for hiring developers. Their platform lacks coding questions, web framework questions, mobile framework questions, and data structures and algorithm questions. Essentially, they do not provide the necessary tools to evaluate a developer's coding proficiency.

While 123test boasts a diverse test library, it is more focused on psychometric and general ability tests. This might be useful for understanding a candidate's personality or cognitive skills, but it falls short when it comes to assessing technical skills required for developer roles.

One notable absence in 123test's offering is the lack of code playback and automated scoring features. These features are important for accurately evaluating a developer's coding process and skill level, without manual intervention from hiring managers.

Comparison of developer hiring features

Adaface vs 123test: Candidate experience and company branding

A candidate's experience during pre-employment tests can make or break their decision to complete the assessment. Tests that feel trustworthy and legitimate are more likely to be finished.

Branding matters in pre-employment tests. A consistent look and feel across the assessment process reassures candidates and can boost completion rates. Other key factors include test length, ease of use, and mobile-friendliness.

Candidate experience and company branding with Adaface

Adaface offers a unique conversational interface for its assessments. This approach makes the tests feel less like traditional exams and more like friendly chats, improving the overall candidate experience.

The platform provides mobile-friendly tests that candidates can take on any device. With typical assessment lengths of 40 minutes, Adaface strikes a balance between thoroughness and candidate convenience.

Adaface allows companies to customize the assessment experience with their own branding. This includes adding logos, using brand colors, and personalizing email templates for invitations and results. These features help maintain a consistent brand image throughout the hiring process.

Candidate experience and company branding with 123test

123test offers a straightforward candidate experience. Tests are mobile-friendly and typically take around 20 minutes to complete, which ensures candidates can complete assessments without a significant time commitment. However, candidates must rely on email support for any queries as there is no help documentation or FAQ section available.

When it comes to company branding, 123test falls short. The platform does not allow companies to incorporate their logos, brand colors, or customizable email templates into the assessment process. This limits the potential to create a seamless and branded candidate experience.

Imagine being able to introduce your company's unique personality right from the test invitation. Tailoring the assessment environment to reflect your company's branding can enhance the candidate's connection with your brand. It offers an opportunity to give candidates a taste of your company culture even before they step through the door.

Unfortunately, 123test doesn't support features like conversational interfaces, qualifying questions, or extensive branding options. This can make the experience feel generic and less engaging for candidates.

Adaface vs 123test: Anti-cheating features

Ensuring the integrity of online assessments is important to maintain fairness and accuracy in pre-employment testing. Recruiters need products with strong anti-cheating features to confidently assess candidates' true abilities without the risk of dishonesty.

Anti-cheating features of Adaface

Adaface excels in anti-cheating measures with a comprehensive suite of features designed to deter and detect any dishonest activities. These include:

• Web and webcam proctoring for monitoring candidate activities.

• IP and location logging to track where candidates are taking tests.

• Device fingerprinting and copy-paste protection to prevent unauthorized assistance.

• Time limits on tests and questions to ensure timely completion and reduce cheating opportunities.

Additionally, Adaface offers unique features like non-googleable, scenario-based questions and Chat GPT protection to further ensure test integrity. With a large question bank and multiple question sets, Adaface minimizes the risk of question leaks, offering a fair assessment environment.

For a deeper dive into these features, check out our complete guide on online remote proctoring and explore how Adaface's proctoring tools ensure accurate assessments.

Anti-cheating features of 123test

123test's anti-cheating features are quite limited. They don't offer user authentication before starting a test, and there's no web or webcam proctoring. The platform also lacks IP tracking and device fingerprint monitoring.

While 123test does implement time limits on their tests, which can help reduce the opportunity for cheating, this stands as their primary anti-cheating measure. The absence of more advanced proctoring features may make it easier for candidates to access external resources during assessments.

The platform doesn't provide multiple question sets or a large question bank, which could make it vulnerable to question leaks. Additionally, there's no mention of plagiarism detection or social listening for task leaks, features that can help maintain test integrity over time.

Comparison of anti-cheating features

Adaface vs 123test: Pricing and free trial

When it comes to assessment tools, pricing can be a maze. Recruiters often find themselves lost in a jungle of plans, features, and hidden costs. But fear not! Let's break down the pricing landscape in a way that won't make your wallet cry.

Adaface pricing

At Adaface, we believe in keeping things simple and transparent. Our pricing is designed to fit various hiring needs without breaking the bank. We offer a range of plans to suit different company sizes and recruitment volumes.

Our plans include:

• Starter: Perfect for small teams, starting at $500 for 50 credits.
• Scale: Ideal for growing companies, priced at $3,000 for 500 credits.
• Growth: For larger organizations, available at $5,500 for 1,000 credits.
• Enterprise: Tailored for big players, starting at $20,000 for 4,000 credits.
• Unlimited: For those who hire like there's no tomorrow, priced at $50,000 per year.

We understand that every company's hiring needs are unique. That's why we offer a free trial, allowing you to explore all our features before making a decision. Plus, our easy sign-up process means you can get started without jumping through hoops or waiting for callbacks.

123test pricing

123test offers a variety of pricing plans to cater to different needs, making it a flexible option for assessment. Here’s a quick rundown of their pricing structure:

• Individual plan: Not available.
• Starter plans: Ranges from $8.99 to $17.99 each.
• Scale plans: Information not specified.
• Growth plans: Information not specified.
• Enterprise plans: Information not specified.
• Unlimited plans: No option for unlimited assessments.

While 123test provides some basic plans, it lacks transparency in its pricing for larger organizations and does not offer an unlimited assessment option. This can make it tricky for companies with fluctuating hiring needs to gauge overall costs and scalability without diving deeper into the details or directly contacting their sales team. It can feel like searching for a hidden treasure map rather than getting straightforward information at a glance!

Comparison of pricing

Adaface vs 123test: Scorecards, reporting and analytics

Having clear and concise assessment scorecards, reporting, and analytics is like having a trusted sidekick for hiring managers. These tools help recruiters make data-driven decisions, save time, and ensure they pick the best candidates. The right platform should offer detailed reports, easy sharing options, and insightful analytics to keep the hiring process smooth and transparent.

Adaface scorecards, reporting and analytics

Adaface offers a range of scorecard, reporting, and analytics features designed to make the recruitment process seamless. It provides PDF, Excel, and CSV report formats, public report links, and benchmarking capabilities. Additionally, Adaface includes detailed skill profiles, skill-wise analysis, and a comprehensive overview of candidates’ performances.

Recruiters can benefit from features like automated scorecard generation and real-time alerts, enabling faster hiring decisions. Adaface’s detailed audit timeline helps in maintaining a transparent and fair assessment process by providing complete proctoring logs. Skills profiles and radar charts offer a visual representation of candidate performance across various skills, comparing them with industry and company averages.

For instance, recruiters can explore various sample scorecards such as the aptitude-test-graphic-designer-assessment scorecard or the data-structures-online-test scorecard to get a sense of the detailed insights Adaface’s reports provide. These features collectively ensure that recruiters have all the necessary tools to select the top talent efficiently.

123test scorecards, reporting and analytics

123test offers basic reporting features for their assessments. They provide automated scorecard generation and alerts after test completion, which can help speed up the hiring process.

However, the platform's reporting capabilities seem limited. It doesn't offer PDF, Excel, or CSV reports, which could make sharing results with team members or clients more challenging.

The absence of features like benchmarking, skills profiles, and skill-wise analysis might make it harder for recruiters to get a quick, in-depth understanding of a candidate's performance across different areas.

Comparison of scorecards, reporting and analytics

Adaface vs 123test: Enterprise and startup friendliness

When comparing Adaface and 123test on enterprise and startup friendliness, it's important to consider features that streamline hiring for both large organizations and nimble startups. An ideal product should integrate smoothly with existing tools, offer flexible plans, and provide comprehensive support to adapt to diverse hiring needs.

Adaface's enterprise and startup friendliness

Adaface shines brightly for startups thanks to its unlimited team seats, which allow growing companies to scale their hiring efforts without worrying about increasing costs for each new recruiter. This means more hands on deck for those crucial early hires without breaking the bank.

For enterprises, Adaface offers a custom API and priority support, ensuring that large teams can integrate assessments into their workflows seamlessly. The ability to manage multiple candidate invites and perform bulk actions makes it a breeze for enterprises handling high-volume hiring events.

Unlike 123test, Adaface provides role-based access and custom data location support, catering specifically to the needs of both startups and enterprises. These features not only enhance security but also ensure that companies can leverage assessments in a way that aligns with their specific organizational structures.

123test's enterprise and startup friendliness

123test doesn't offer specific features for enterprises or startups. It's a general platform where users manually email test links to candidates. The site is GDPR compliant, but lacks ATS integrations or API access.

Candidates can take tests on any device in 10-20 minutes. They can view results without an account, but need one to save and share. This setup might work for small-scale hiring or individual assessments.

The platform misses key features like bulk invitations, custom branding, or role-based access. Support is limited to email, which may not meet the needs of larger organizations or those hiring at scale.

Comparison of enterprise and startup friendliness

Adaface vs 123test: Assessment quality control

When it comes to assessments, quality control is the magic wand that ensures your tests are fair, reliable, and accurate. Recruiters should care about this because the right quality measures mean better candidates and smarter hiring decisions.

Adaface's quality control features

Adaface employs a multi-layered quality control system, where every question undergoes rigorous checks before hitting the platform. This ensures that what you’re testing is relevant and reflective of real-world skills.

Feedback is a big deal here! Adaface actively listens to both candidates and customers, using that input to continuously refine and improve the test library. This commitment helps in keeping the assessments fresh and effective.

With proprietary algorithms at play, Adaface can evaluate the quality of questions dynamically, ensuring only the best make the cut. Recruiters can rest easy knowing they’re using assessments that are not just good, but scientifically backed. For more on how we design our questions, check out our science page.

123test's quality control features

123test's quality control process seems limited based on available information. The platform offers psychometric tests to measure behavior and personality traits, with all candidates taking the same assessment.

This standardized approach means customers can't customize or adjust the assessment to fit their specific needs. It's unclear how often 123test updates its question bank or reviews its assessment methodology.

The platform appears to lack mechanisms for incorporating user feedback or monitoring social channels for potential question leaks. There's also no mention of proprietary algorithms to evaluate and improve question quality over time.

Comparison of quality control

Adaface vs 123test: Customer support

Customer support can make or break your experience with an assessment platform. Good support helps you use the tool better, solve problems faster, and get more value from your investment.

Adaface's customer support features

Adaface offers multiple support channels to meet different needs. We provide email support and live chat for quick issue resolution. Our help center is packed with guides and FAQs for self-service.

For enterprise clients, we offer dedicated priority support. This means you have a direct point of contact for all your queries and concerns. It's like having a personal guide for your Adaface journey.

We also believe in empowering our users. That's why we provide training and onboarding sessions. These help you understand the platform better and use it more effectively in your hiring process.

123test's customer support features

123test offers email support, allowing users to reach out for answers to their queries. However, they lack live chat support, making it less convenient for those who prefer instant responses.

While they provide email assistance, there's no dedicated priority support or training resources available, which can leave users feeling a bit lost in their assessment journey.

Comparison of customer support

Adaface vs 123test: Conclusion

Both Adaface and 123test offer aptitude tests and personality assessments. They also provide ready-to-use tests that recruiters can use right away.

However, Adaface stands out with its wider range of test types. It offers programming tests, situational judgment assessments, and job-specific evaluations that 123test doesn't have.

123test lacks many features that make Adaface more useful for businesses. It doesn't offer custom questions, ATS integrations, or advanced proctoring options.

Streamline hiring with skill tests

Adaface provides a more complete solution with features like customizable tests, multiple question sets, and detailed skill-wise analysis in reports.

Pre-employment assessments help recruiters evaluate candidates objectively. They test job-specific skills, personality traits, and cognitive abilities to give a full picture of each applicant.

These tools save time by quickly comparing candidates without needing to read through stacks of resumes. They also help reduce bias in the hiring process.

For most companies, Adaface is the better choice due to its wider range of tests and features. To see how it could work for your hiring needs, check out our plans or try our free trial.